ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

中性球形CODAS扩展方法×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20241995
提出者Bhuvaneshwari, S., Antony Crispin Sweety, C.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Neutrosophic Spherical Set (NSS) outranking — T,I,F ∈ [0,1] independent with squared-norm bound 0 ≤ T²+I²+F² ≤ √3 (Bhuvaneshwari-Sweety 2024 Eq.(2)); combined with CODAS Euclidean-distance rankingStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Bhuvaneshwari, S., Antony Crispin Sweety, C. (2024). Neutrosophic Spherical Sets in MCDM. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要NSS-CODAS (Neutrosophic Spherical extension of CODAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bhuvaneshwari, S., Antony Crispin Sweety, C. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: NSS-CODAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare