ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

非线性Toda-Yamamoto因果检验×格兰杰因果检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1995 (base); nonlinear extensions 2000s–2010s1969
提出者Toda & Yamamoto (1995) for the linear base; nonlinear extension developed by subsequent researchers applying rank transformations or neural-network-augmented VARClive W. J. Granger
类型Causality testTime-series predictive causality test
开创性文献Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250. DOI ↗Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. DOI ↗
别名nonlinear TY causality, rank-based Toda-Yamamoto test, modified Wald nonlinear causality, NTY causality testGranger causality test, Granger non-causality test, predictive causality test, Granger Nedensellik Testi
相关55
摘要The Nonlinear Toda-Yamamoto causality test extends the classic Toda-Yamamoto (1995) modified Wald procedure to detect causal linkages that are hidden in the means of series but manifest through nonlinear dynamics such as asymmetries, threshold effects, or volatility transmission. It fits an augmented VAR on rank-transformed or otherwise nonlinearly mapped series and applies a chi-squared Wald test on the extra-lag coefficients.The Granger causality test, introduced by Clive W. J. Granger in 1969, assesses whether the past values of one time series help predict another beyond what the latter's own past already explains. It defines causality in a strictly predictive sense rather than as a structural or physical cause.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Nonlinear Toda-Yamamoto Causality · Granger Causality. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare