ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

确定客观标准权重的НМД方法×组合折衷解×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20172019
提出者Bulut, E.Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Aggregated exponential comparison (WSM + WPM combination)
开创性文献Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (COCOSO) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: NMD · COCOSO. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare