ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

确定客观标准权重的НМД方法×自动成对线性排序组合×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20172020
提出者Bulut, E.Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A.
类型Weight_Objective (normalised matrix column-mean based)Pairwise dominance aggregation (automatic combination)
开创性文献Bulut, E. (2017). A comparative analysis of the criteria weights determination methods for selection of ship propulsion system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment link ↗Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A. (2020). APLOCO: A linear programming-based multicriteria ranking method that handles dependent criteria and criteria groups. Operational Research link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要NMD (New Method of Determining objective criterion weights) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bulut, E. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.APLOCO (Automatic Pairwise Linear Order Combination) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: NMD · APLOCO. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare