ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纽约心脏协会 (NYHA) 功能分级×明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷 (MLHFQ)×
领域心脏病学心脏病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19941987
提出者New York Heart AssociationTimothy S. Rector
类型Ordinal clinician-assessment classification systemSelf-report questionnaire
开创性文献The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. (1994). Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels (9th ed.). Little, Brown and Company. link ↗Rector, T. S., Kubo, S. H., & Cohn, J. N. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: Content, reliability and responsiveness of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3(5), 198–209. link ↗
别名NYHA, NYHA Class, Functional ClassificationMLHFQ
相关44
摘要The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification is a four-category ordinal system for grading heart failure severity based on the level of physical activity that precipitates dyspnea or other HF symptoms. Established by the NYHA in 1928 and refined in 1994, the NYHA classification is the oldest and most widely used functional status metric in cardiology, providing a simple, clinically intuitive framework for describing HF symptom burden, guiding treatment intensity, and predicting prognosis.The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a 21-item self-report measure that quantifies the multidimensional burden of heart failure on patients' daily living and quality of life. Developed by Rector, Kubo, and Cohn in 1987, the MLHFQ is the most widely used disease-specific QoL instrument in heart failure research and clinical practice, valued for its brevity, sensitivity to treatment response, and predictive value for prognosis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: New York Heart Association Functional Classification · Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare