ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于网络的文献计量分析×文献耦合分析×
领域科学计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s1963
提出者Derek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping)Melvin M. Kessler
类型Quantitative bibliometric methodMethod
开创性文献van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗
别名scientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mappingdocument coupling, bibliographic similarity
相关65
摘要Network-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used.Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Network-based Scientometric analysis · Bibliographic Coupling. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare