方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于网络的文献图谱综述× | 文献计量分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 科学计量学 | 科学计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s |
| 提出者≠ | Petticrew & Roberts (mapping review); network overlay adopted from bibliometric network analysis tradition | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) |
| 类型≠ | Evidence synthesis method with network analysis overlay | Quantitative literature analysis |
| 开创性文献≠ | Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN: 978-1405121101 | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ |
| 别名 | network mapping review, citation-network mapping review, network-enhanced evidence mapping, network-informed mapping review | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | A network-based mapping review combines the breadth of a traditional evidence mapping exercise with bibliometric network analysis to chart the structural landscape of a research field. Rather than simply cataloguing studies by topic, this approach constructs citation, co-authorship, or co-word networks to reveal clusters of intellectual activity, influential works, and collaboration patterns — producing both a visual and a descriptive map of the evidence base. | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|