ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于网络的共被引分析×科学制图×
领域科学计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1973 (co-citation); network-analytic extension widely adopted 2000s–2010s2000s
提出者Henry Small (co-citation foundation); network visualization extended by Chaomei Chen and othersKaty Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others
类型Bibliometric network analysisMethod
开创性文献Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗
别名co-citation network analysis, bibliometric network co-citation, co-citation mapping, CCA network approachknowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization
相关65
摘要Network-based co-citation analysis is a bibliometric technique that measures how often pairs of documents are cited together by later works, then models those relationships as a weighted network. Nodes represent documents (or authors or journals), edges represent co-citation frequency, and network algorithms identify clusters of intellectually related literature. It is widely used in systematic and scoping reviews to map the intellectual structure of a research field.Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Network-based Co-citation Analysis · Science Mapping. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare