ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于网络的共被引分析×文献耦合分析×
领域科学计量学文献计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1973 (co-citation); network-analytic extension widely adopted 2000s–2010s1963
提出者Henry Small (co-citation foundation); network visualization extended by Chaomei Chen and othersMelvin M. Kessler
类型Bibliometric network analysisMethod
开创性文献Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(3), 123–131. DOI ↗
别名co-citation network analysis, bibliometric network co-citation, co-citation mapping, CCA network approachdocument coupling, bibliographic similarity
相关65
摘要Network-based co-citation analysis is a bibliometric technique that measures how often pairs of documents are cited together by later works, then models those relationships as a weighted network. Nodes represent documents (or authors or journals), edges represent co-citation frequency, and network algorithms identify clusters of intellectually related literature. It is widely used in systematic and scoping reviews to map the intellectual structure of a research field.Bibliographic coupling is a method that identifies intellectual relationships between documents by measuring their shared references. Two papers are considered 'coupled' when they cite the same sources, indicating they address related research questions or draw from the same conceptual foundations. Introduced by Kessler in 1963, this approach enables researchers to map knowledge domains and discover thematically similar publications without relying on subject cataloging or keywords.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Network-based Co-citation Analysis · Bibliographic Coupling. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare