ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Natural Experiment in Politics×自然实验×
领域Political Science实验设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20121990s (formal methodological articulation); earlier in epidemiology (John Snow, 1854)
提出者Dunning (design-based framework); Lee (close-election RD lineage)Varied; systematized in econometrics and political science (e.g., Meyer 1995; Angrist & Krueger 1991)
类型Observational study exploiting as-if random assignmentQuasi-experimental research design
开创性文献Dunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107698000Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151–161. DOI ↗
别名Political natural experiment, As-if random design, Design-based natural experiment, Quasi-experiment with as-if randomizationnatural quasi-experiment, naturally occurring experiment, exogenous shock design, as-if randomization
相关43
摘要A natural experiment in political science exploits a naturally occurring source of as-if random assignment — close elections, lotteries, arbitrary boundaries, or policy thresholds — to identify causal effects without the researcher manipulating anything. Codified for the social sciences by Thad Dunning's 2012 design-based treatment and exemplified by David Lee's close-election regression-discontinuity analysis of U.S. House races, the approach treats nature, institutions, or chance as if they had run an experiment, recovering credible causal estimates from observational data when randomization is impossible.A natural experiment exploits a real-world event, policy, or circumstance that assigns individuals to treatment and control conditions in a way that is plausibly random — or at least exogenous to the outcome of interest. Because the researcher does not control assignment, it occupies a middle ground between a true randomized controlled trial and purely observational research, offering stronger causal leverage than conventional observational designs when the as-if randomization assumption holds.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Natural Experiment in Politics · Natural Experiment. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare