方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 叙事综述× | 定性元综合× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 证据综合 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Pre-20th century practice; peer-reviewed methodological guidance from 2000s onward | 2007 |
| 提出者≠ | Traditional academic practice; formalized discussion by Green, Johnson & Adams (2006) | Sandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008) |
| 类型≠ | Literature review methodology | Framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. DOI ↗ | Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | traditional review, expert review, unsystematic review, narrative synthesis | Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | A narrative review is a broad, author-directed synthesis of published literature on a topic, written to summarize, interpret, and contextualize existing knowledge without following the rigorous, pre-registered search and selection protocols that characterize systematic reviews. It draws on the author's expertise to weave disparate sources into a coherent account that identifies themes, debates, and directions for future research. | Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|