方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例反思主题分析× | 案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2006 (RTA origins); 2010s onward (combined application) | 1984 (seminal codification) |
| 提出者≠ | Braun & Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); Yin (multiple case study framework) | Robert K. Yin (systematised in Case Study Research, 1984) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953246 | Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名≠ | MC-RTA, multi-case reflexive thematic analysis, cross-case reflexive thematic analysis, multiple case RTA | Vaka Çalışması (Case Study), case study design, case study methodology |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple case-based reflexive thematic analysis integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) with a multiple case study framework. Qualitative data are collected from two or more bounded cases, RTA is applied within each case to generate case-specific themes, and the themes are then compared and synthesised across cases. The approach preserves the depth and interpretive richness of RTA while enabling cross-case pattern recognition that single-case designs cannot provide. | Case study research is a qualitative research design that investigates a specific phenomenon, individual, group, organisation, or event in depth within its real-world context. Systematised by Robert K. Yin in 1984, it supports single-case and multiple-case designs and draws on multiple data sources — interviews, observation, documents, and artefacts — to build a rich, contextualised account of a bounded unit. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|