方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例叙事探究× | 比较案例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s (synthesis of Clandinin & Connelly 2000 with multiple case study design) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提出者≠ | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); Robert K. Yin (multiple case logic) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 别名 | multi-case narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, comparative narrative inquiry, multi-site narrative inquiry | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple case-based narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that applies narrative inquiry — the study of human experience through story — across two or more purposively selected cases. Each case is treated as a bounded narrative unit, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case comparison. The approach draws on Clandinin and Connelly's narrative inquiry tradition while adopting the replication logic of multiple case design to build richer, more transferable understandings of how people narrate and make meaning of their experiences. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|