方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例隐喻分析× | 叙事分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| 提出者≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Qualitative interpretive method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| 别名 | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|