方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例隐喻分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logic | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative comparative design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|