ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多案例隐喻分析×内容分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–2000s (synthesis emerged in qualitative case research)Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Building on Lakoff & Johnson (1980) conceptual metaphor theory and Yin's multiple-case logicKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative comparative designQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名cross-case metaphor analysis, comparative metaphor analysis, multi-case metaphor study, MCBMAİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关65
摘要Multiple case-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative comparative method that systematically identifies and interprets metaphorical language across two or more bounded cases — such as schools, organisations, or participant groups — to reveal how people in different contexts conceptualise a shared phenomenon. It integrates Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory with Yin's multiple-case logic, enabling both within-case depth and cross-case breadth.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple Case-Based Metaphor Analysis · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare