方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例批判性话语分析× | 主题分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (CDA foundations ~1989–1995; multiple case integration in applied discourse research) | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough (CDA); Robert K. Yin (multiple case design) | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | multi-case CDA, comparative critical discourse analysis, cross-case CDA, multiple case CDA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple case-based critical discourse analysis (multi-case CDA) combines the comparative logic of multiple case study design with the ideological and power-focused analytic apparatus of critical discourse analysis. The researcher selects two or more purposefully chosen cases, collects relevant texts or spoken discourse within each, applies CDA to reveal how language constructs power relations and ideologies within each case, and then synthesises findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and broader sociocritical insights that a single-case design could not yield. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|