ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多案例批判性话语分析×多案例研究×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (CDA foundations ~1989–1995; multiple case integration in applied discourse research)1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995)
提出者Norman Fairclough (CDA); Robert K. Yin (multiple case design)Robert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition)
类型Qualitative research design and analytic methodQualitative research method
开创性文献Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
别名multi-case CDA, comparative critical discourse analysis, cross-case CDA, multiple case CDAcomparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis
相关56
摘要Multiple case-based critical discourse analysis (multi-case CDA) combines the comparative logic of multiple case study design with the ideological and power-focused analytic apparatus of critical discourse analysis. The researcher selects two or more purposefully chosen cases, collects relevant texts or spoken discourse within each, applies CDA to reveal how language constructs power relations and ideologies within each case, and then synthesises findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and broader sociocritical insights that a single-case design could not yield.Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple case-based critical discourse analysis · Multiple-Case Study. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare