ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Multiple Case-Based Conversation Analysis×多案例研究×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onward1980s–1990s (Yin's first edition 1984; Stake's collective case study concept 1995)
提出者Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert YinRobert K. Yin (systematic replication logic); Robert E. Stake (naturalistic/collective case tradition)
类型Qualitative multi-case analytic designQualitative research method
开创性文献Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169
别名multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CAcomparative case study, multi-site case study, collective case study, cross-case analysis
相关56
摘要Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish.Multiple-case study design investigates two or more bounded real-world cases using the same research protocol, then compares findings across cases to identify patterns, contrasts, and explanatory insights that a single case could not produce. Developed primarily through Robert Yin's replication logic and Robert Stake's collective case tradition, the approach is particularly powerful when a researcher needs to determine whether a phenomenon occurs under varied conditions or to test an emerging theoretical explanation against rival contexts.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple case-based conversation analysis · Multiple-Case Study. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare