ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Multiple Case-Based Conversation Analysis×批判性话语分析 (CDA)×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onwardLate 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提出者Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert YinNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
类型Qualitative multi-case analytic designQualitative research method
开创性文献Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
别名multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CACDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
相关56
摘要Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple case-based conversation analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare