ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Multiple Case-Based Conversation Analysis×比较对话分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份CA founded ~1960s–1970s; multi-case extension adopted from late 1990s onward1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s
提出者Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA); multiple-case design from Robert YinHarvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward
类型Qualitative multi-case analytic designQualitative micro-analytic research design
开创性文献Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗
别名multi-case CA, cross-case conversation analysis, comparative conversation analysis, multiple-instance CAcomparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction
相关53
摘要Multiple case-based conversation analysis applies the fine-grained sequential methods of Conversation Analysis (CA) across two or more distinct cases — settings, groups, or interactions — to identify both case-specific patterns and cross-case regularities in naturally occurring talk. By examining how participants organise turn-taking, repair, and action sequences in multiple contexts, the approach strengthens claims about interactional phenomena beyond what a single-case study can establish.Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple case-based conversation analysis · Comparative Conversation Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare