ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多案例基础的经典扎根理论×建构主义扎根理论×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1967 (foundational); multi-case adaptation developed through 1970s–1990s2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
提出者Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (foundational); Glaser extended for comparative multi-case contextsKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
类型Qualitative inductive theory-generation designQualitative research method
开创性文献Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
别名multi-case CGT, classic GT with multiple cases, comparative grounded theory, Glaserian multi-case grounded theoryCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
相关66
摘要Multiple case-based classic grounded theory (CGT) extends Glaser and Strauss's original inductive framework by grounding theory development simultaneously across two or more purposefully selected cases. Rather than studying a single site or participant group, the researcher treats each case as a distinct analytic unit while using the constant comparative method to draw cross-case theoretical insights. The goal is the same as in all classic GT: emergence of a substantive theory that explains the main concern of participants — but the multi-case structure broadens the conceptual base and supports more robust theoretical abstraction.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multiple Case-Based Classic Grounded Theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare