方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多案例基础的经典扎根理论× | 恒定比较法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 (foundational); multi-case adaptation developed through 1970s–1990s | 1967 |
| 提出者≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (foundational); Glaser extended for comparative multi-case contexts | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative inductive theory-generation design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 别名 | multi-case CGT, classic GT with multiple cases, comparative grounded theory, Glaserian multi-case grounded theory | CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Multiple case-based classic grounded theory (CGT) extends Glaser and Strauss's original inductive framework by grounding theory development simultaneously across two or more purposefully selected cases. Rather than studying a single site or participant group, the researcher treats each case as a distinct analytic unit while using the constant comparative method to draw cross-case theoretical insights. The goal is the same as in all classic GT: emergence of a substantive theory that explains the main concern of participants — but the multi-case structure broadens the conceptual base and supports more robust theoretical abstraction. | The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|