ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多层重测信度×验证性因子分析(CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1979 (ICC foundation); multilevel extension: 1990s–2000s1969
提出者Shrout & Fleiss (ICC foundation); multilevel extension by Goldstein, Snijders, and othersKarl Gustav Jöreskog
类型Reliability estimation under hierarchical dataHypothesis-testing latent variable model
开创性文献Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
别名hierarchical test-retest reliability, multilevel ICC reliability, nested test-retest reliability, ML-TRT reliabilityCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
相关54
摘要Multilevel test-retest reliability estimates how consistently a measurement instrument produces the same scores across repeated administrations when observations are nested within higher-level units — such as patients within clinics or students within classrooms. It partitions total score variance across levels using intraclass correlation coefficients derived from multilevel models.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multilevel Test-Retest Reliability · Confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare