方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多层可靠性分析× | McDonald's Hierarchical Omega (ωh)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 2014 | 1999 |
| 提出者≠ | Geldhof, Preacher & Zyphur | Roderick P. McDonald |
| 类型≠ | Reliability estimation / psychometric modeling | Reliability / composite score validity coefficient |
| 开创性文献≠ | Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. DOI ↗ | Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F. & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | multilevel omega, within-group reliability, between-group reliability, hierarchical reliability | omega hierarchical, omega-h, bifactor omega, composite score validity coefficient |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Multilevel reliability analysis estimates the internal consistency of scale scores separately at the within-group (individual) and between-group (cluster) levels. It corrects the bias that arises when ordinary alpha or omega is applied to hierarchically nested data, such as employees within organizations or students within classrooms. | McDonald's hierarchical omega (ωh) is a coefficient derived from a bifactor confirmatory factor model that quantifies what proportion of total-score variance is attributable to a single general factor rather than to group-specific factors or item-level error. Introduced by Roderick P. McDonald (1999) and elaborated for bifactor applications by Reise and colleagues (2013) and Rodriguez and colleagues (2016), it is the primary index used in psychometrics to evaluate whether a composite total score is a defensible summary of a multidimensional scale. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|