ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多层列联效度×验证性因子分析(CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份20051969
提出者Chen, Bliese & Mathieu (building on Cronbach & Meehl)Karl Gustav Jöreskog
类型Validity assessment / construct validationHypothesis-testing latent variable model
开创性文献Chen, G., Bliese, P. D. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
别名cross-level construct validity, multilevel construct validation, MNV, nomological validity across levelsCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
相关44
摘要Multilevel nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct and its network of theoretical relationships hold consistently across multiple levels of analysis — such as individual, team, and organization. It extends classical construct validation to nested data structures, ensuring that a measure means the same thing and behaves as theory predicts at each level.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multilevel nomological validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare