方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多中心随机临床试验× | 荟萃分析随机对照试验× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 流行病学 | 流行病学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials) | 1976 (Glass coinage of meta-analysis); 1993 (Cochrane Collaboration formalization) |
| 提出者≠ | Evolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980s | Gene V. Glass (meta-analysis method); Cochrane Collaboration (systematic RCT pooling standards) |
| 类型≠ | Interventional experimental design | Quantitative evidence-synthesis design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385 | Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1119536628 |
| 别名 | multi-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trial | meta-analytic RCT, MA-RCT, meta-analysis of RCTs, pooled randomized trial analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments. | A meta-analytic randomized clinical trial is a formal evidence-synthesis method that identifies, appraises, and statistically combines the results of multiple randomized clinical trials addressing the same clinical question. By pooling trial-level data, it produces a single, more precise estimate of treatment effect and quantifies between-trial heterogeneity, sitting at the apex of the evidence hierarchy for evaluating healthcare interventions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|