ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多中心剂量-反应分析×剂量-反应分析×多中心队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1992 (foundational trend methods); refined 2000s–2010sConceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th centuryMid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s)
提出者Greenland & Longnecker; extended by Orsini et al.Paracelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford HillDeveloped incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992)
类型Quantitative epidemiological analysisQuantitative analytical methodObservational longitudinal study
开创性文献Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992). Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135(11), 1301-1309. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名pooled dose-response analysis, multicenter exposure-response analysis, multi-site dose-response modeling, collaborative dose-response studyexposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRAmultisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study
相关246
摘要Multicenter dose-response analysis estimates the quantitative shape of the relationship between a graded exposure and a health outcome by pooling data or effect estimates across two or more study centers. Using flexible regression tools such as restricted cubic splines or fractional polynomials within a two-stage meta-analytic framework, it characterizes whether the relationship is linear, supra-linear, threshold-based, or J-shaped — providing far greater statistical power and generalizability than any single center could achieve alone.Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference.A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multicenter Dose-Response Analysis · Dose-Response Analysis · Multicenter cohort study. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare