ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多中心Cox比例风险模型×多中心队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1972 (Cox model); multicenter applications formalized 1980s–1990sMid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s)
提出者D. R. Cox (Cox PH model); multicenter extension developed through collaborative trial methodologyDeveloped incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992)
类型Semi-parametric survival regression for clustered dataObservational longitudinal study
开创性文献Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名multicenter Cox regression, multisite Cox PH model, stratified Cox model across centers, multicenter survival regressionmultisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study
相关46
摘要Multicenter Cox proportional hazards regression extends the classic Cox PH model to studies conducted at two or more clinical sites or centers. It estimates the effect of predictors on time-to-event outcomes while explicitly accounting for clustering within centers, between-center heterogeneity, and potential differences in baseline hazard across sites. This design is standard practice in large multicenter RCTs and observational cohort studies in oncology, cardiology, and other clinical fields.A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multicenter Cox proportional hazards · Multicenter cohort study. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare