方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多源半结构化访谈× | 三角半结构化访谈× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–2000s (multi-source data strategies in qualitative inquiry) | Formalized in practice from the late 1970s onward |
| 提出者≠ | Established practice in qualitative and mixed-methods research; systematized by Patton (2002) and Bryman (2016) | Synthesized from Norman K. Denzin (triangulation) and H. Russell Bernard (semi-structured interviewing) |
| 类型 | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198745754 | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ |
| 别名 | multi-informant semi-structured interview, multi-perspective semi-structured interview, multi-source qualitative interview, triangulated semi-structured interview | triangulated qualitative interview, multi-source semi-structured interview, triangulated in-depth interview, convergent interview strategy |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | A multi-source semi-structured interview strategy collects qualitative data via guided, open-ended interviews from two or more distinct groups or perspectives relevant to the same phenomenon. By deliberately querying multiple vantage points — such as managers and employees, patients and clinicians, or teachers and students — the researcher can compare, contrast, and triangulate accounts, producing a richer and more balanced picture than any single-source approach allows. | A triangulated semi-structured interview strategy combines the flexibility of open-ended, guided interviewing with deliberate triangulation across multiple informant groups, data sources, or interview occasions. By applying the same semi-structured protocol to different participant perspectives — such as clients, providers, and managers — or by pairing interviews with documents and observations, the approach cross-validates emerging themes and reduces the risk that any single viewpoint dominates the findings. The result is richer, more credible qualitative data than a single-source interview study can deliver. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|