ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多源现场笔记×三角检验证据×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1970s–1990s (multi-observer extensions formalised in mixed-methods era)1970s–1980s
提出者Ethnographic research tradition; systematised by Emerson, Fretz & ShawNorman K. Denzin (triangulation); Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba (trustworthiness framework)
类型Qualitative data collection techniqueQualitative data collection and verification technique
开创性文献Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206837Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗
别名multi-observer field notes, triangulated field notes, collaborative field notes, multi-site field notesmulti-source field notes, cross-observer field notes, triangulated observation notes, TFN
相关65
摘要Multi-source field notes is a data collection approach in which two or more observers, sites, or vantage points contribute written records of naturally occurring events, interactions, and settings. By pooling notes from multiple sources, researchers cross-check individual impressions and capture aspects of a scene that any single observer would miss, strengthening descriptive richness and analytical trustworthiness.Triangulated Field Notes is a qualitative data collection technique in which field notes are recorded independently by multiple observers, from multiple vantage points, or at multiple time points and then systematically compared to strengthen the credibility and completeness of observational data. Rooted in Denzin's triangulation framework and Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria, the approach counters observer bias by cross-checking accounts before analysis begins.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-source Field Notes · Triangulated Field Notes. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare