方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多源现场笔记× | 三角检验证据× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1990s (multi-observer extensions formalised in mixed-methods era) | 1970s–1980s |
| 提出者≠ | Ethnographic research tradition; systematised by Emerson, Fretz & Shaw | Norman K. Denzin (triangulation); Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba (trustworthiness framework) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection and verification technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206837 | Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. link ↗ |
| 别名 | multi-observer field notes, triangulated field notes, collaborative field notes, multi-site field notes | multi-source field notes, cross-observer field notes, triangulated observation notes, TFN |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-source field notes is a data collection approach in which two or more observers, sites, or vantage points contribute written records of naturally occurring events, interactions, and settings. By pooling notes from multiple sources, researchers cross-check individual impressions and capture aspects of a scene that any single observer would miss, strengthening descriptive richness and analytical trustworthiness. | Triangulated Field Notes is a qualitative data collection technique in which field notes are recorded independently by multiple observers, from multiple vantage points, or at multiple time points and then systematically compared to strengthen the credibility and completeness of observational data. Rooted in Denzin's triangulation framework and Lincoln and Guba's trustworthiness criteria, the approach counters observer bias by cross-checking accounts before analysis begins. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|