ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多期反事实概率加权法×倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20001983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
提出者Robins, Hernan & BrumbackRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
类型Weighted causal estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
开创性文献Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal IPW, multi-period IPW, time-varying IPW, sequential IPWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
相关66
摘要Multi-period Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) estimates the causal effect of a treatment that varies across multiple time periods by reweighting observations according to the probability of receiving each period's treatment given past treatment history and time-varying confounders. It creates a pseudo-population where treatment at each period is independent of measured confounders, enabling unbiased estimation of sustained treatment strategies.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-period Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare