方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多期反事实影响评估× | 动态双重差分× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2021 |
| 提出者≠ | Developed through EU policy evaluation practice (European Commission); formalized by Lechner, Caliendo, and related econometricians | Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham |
| 类型≠ | Causal inference / quasi-experimental evaluation | Causal inference / quasi-experimental |
| 开创性文献≠ | Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72. DOI ↗ | Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | multi-period CIE, longitudinal counterfactual evaluation, dynamic counterfactual impact evaluation, multi-wave CIE | Dynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-period Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE) estimates the causal effect of a policy or program by constructing what would have happened to treated units across multiple time periods had they not been treated. Unlike single-period evaluations, it tracks treatment effects as they evolve over time, capturing dynamic, delayed, or fading impacts that a two-period comparison would miss. | Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|