方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多期粗糙化精确匹配× | 倾向得分匹配× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 研究统计学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012–2021 | 1983 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM, 2012); extended to multi-period panel settings | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| 类型≠ | Non-parametric matching / causal inference | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Multi-period CEM, Longitudinal CEM, Panel CEM, Multi-wave CEM | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-period Coarsened Exact Matching (multi-period CEM) extends the CEM framework of Iacus, King, and Porro to longitudinal data with multiple pre- and post-treatment periods. It bins continuous covariates into coarsened categories, matches treated and control units that fall into the same cells across all relevant time periods, and then estimates a weighted average treatment effect that accounts for temporal structure. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|