ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多层加权抽样×加权抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1960s–1980s (developed alongside large-scale survey programs)1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
提出者Leslie Kish (probability sampling theory); complex survey methodologistsMorris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
类型Probability sampling designProbability sampling design
开创性文献Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons. New York. ISBN: 978-0471109495Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
别名hierarchical weighted sampling, nested weighted sampling, multilevel probability weighting, weighted hierarchical samplingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
相关66
摘要Multi-level weighted sampling is a probability-based survey design that draws samples from hierarchically nested populations — such as students within classrooms within schools within districts — and assigns design weights at each level to account for unequal selection probabilities. The resulting weighted data enable unbiased population-level inference despite the complex, non-proportional structure of the sampling frame. It is the backbone of major international assessments such as PISA and TIMSS.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-level weighted sampling · Weighted Sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare