方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多层目的性抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Derived from Patton's purposive sampling framework; formalized in multi-site qualitative and mixed-methods research | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型 | Non-probability sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名 | hierarchical purposive sampling, nested purposive sampling, multi-tier purposive sampling, multi-site purposive sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-level purposive sampling applies purposive selection criteria at two or more nested levels of a research hierarchy — for instance, first selecting sites or organizations, then selecting participants within each site. This layered approach allows researchers to align the theoretical logic of purposive sampling with the real-world structure of complex, hierarchical populations, making it especially valuable in multi-site qualitative studies and mixed-methods research. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|