ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多层便利抽样×多层分层抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–1990s (concurrent with multilevel modeling development)1950s–1970s
提出者Emerged from multilevel/hierarchical research traditionsFormalized by Leslie Kish and William G. Cochran in the mid-20th century survey sampling literature
类型Non-probability sampling designProbability sampling design
开创性文献Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728462Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
别名hierarchical convenience sampling, nested convenience sampling, multilevel accessibility sampling, multi-tier convenience samplinghierarchical stratified sampling, nested stratified sampling, multilevel stratified design, stratified multilevel sampling
相关56
摘要Multi-level convenience sampling is a non-probability approach in which units are selected by convenience at each of two or more nested levels of a hierarchy — for example, recruiting whatever schools agree to participate and then enrolling all available students within those schools. It is widely used in organizational, educational, and health research where the researcher has limited control over access but must respect the nested structure of the population.Multi-level stratified sampling applies stratification at two or more hierarchical levels of a nested population structure — for example, first stratifying geographic regions, then stratifying schools within each region, then stratifying classrooms within each school. This layered control over the composition of the sample at every level reduces variance and supports analysis at each level of the hierarchy, making it a powerful design for large-scale educational, epidemiological, and organizational surveys.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-level Convenience Sampling · Multi-level Stratified Sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare