ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多群体项目反应理论 (MG-IRT)×多群体测量不变性检验×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1990s1971–1993
提出者Multiple contributors; formalized by Birnbaum (1968) for IRT; multi-group extensions developed through 1980s–1990sJöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993)
类型Latent trait / measurement invarianceModel comparison / hypothesis testing
开创性文献Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805828191Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名MG-IRT, multiple-group IRT, multi-group latent trait model, IRT across groupsmeasurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing
相关66
摘要Multi-group item response theory fits IRT models simultaneously across two or more defined groups — such as males and females, or different cultural samples — to determine whether item parameters are invariant across those groups. It is the primary IRT-based framework for testing measurement equivalence and detecting differential item functioning (DIF) at the model level.Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group item response theory · Multi-group measurement invariance. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare