方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多群体收敛效度× | 判别效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1981 / 2000 | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Fornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension) | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment procedure | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | cross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groups | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|