ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

MPF-PROMETHEE×层次分析法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20201980
提出者Akram, M., Shumaiza, Alcantud, J. C. R.Saaty, T. L.
类型Outranking-flow PROMETHEE — six generalized criteria preference functions (I–VI), AHP-assisted scalar weights, positive/negative/net outranking flows, PROMETHEE I partial pre-order + PROMETHEE II complete orderPairwise comparison (eigenvalue)
开创性文献Akram, M., Shumaiza, Alcantud, J. C. R. (2020). An m-Polar Fuzzy PROMETHEE Approach for AHP-Assisted Group Decision-Making. Mathematical and Computational Applications (MDPI) DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713
别名
相关18
摘要MPF-PROMETHEE (m-Polar Fuzzy extension of PROMETHEE I/II with AHP-derived crisp weights, six Brans–Vincke generalized criteria preference functions, and positive/negative/net outranking flows (Akram, Shumaiza & Alcantud 2020 / Akram & Adeel 2023 Ch. 7)) is a outranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Shumaiza, Alcantud, J. C. R. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: MPF-PROMETHEE · AHP. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare