方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 镶嵌式抄袭× | Turnitin 和 iThenticate 相似度检测× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究伦理 | 研究伦理 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s | 1997 |
| 提出者≠ | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) | Turnitin (1997), iThenticate (commercial variant) |
| 类型≠ | Concept | Tool |
| 开创性文献≠ | Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗ | Turnitin. (2023). Turnitin similarity detection and plagiarism detection technology. Retrieved from https://www.turnitin.com/products/similarity link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | patch-writing, patchwork plagiarism, incremental plagiarism | text-matching software, plagiarism detection software, similarity detection, originality reports |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Mosaic plagiarism, also called patch-writing, occurs when an author mixes copied phrases and sentences from a source with original text, rearranges material from multiple sources, or interweaves paraphrased and verbatim passages without proper citation or quotation marks. It is difficult to detect because the copied portions are interspersed with original writing, creating a surface appearance of original work. | Turnitin and iThenticate are commercial text-matching software tools used by educational institutions and academic journals to screen submissions for potential plagiarism. Turnitin is designed for student assignments; iThenticate is designed for researcher manuscripts. Both tools compare submitted text against billions of sources (web pages, academic databases, previously submitted documents) and generate a Similarity Index showing what percentage of the submission matches existing sources. These tools are screening instruments, not plagiarism detectors—they flag suspicious content for human review. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|