ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

移动现场笔记×研究日志×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s (digital turn in ethnography)1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology
提出者Emergent from digital ethnography practice; theorised notably by Sarah Pink and colleaguesRobert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment)
类型Qualitative data collection techniqueQualitative data collection and reflexivity tool
开创性文献Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-1446287972Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗
别名digital field notes, smartphone field notes, mobile ethnographic notes, in-situ digital notesresearcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary
相关66
摘要Mobile Field Notes is a data collection technique in which researchers use smartphones, tablets, or wearable devices to record observations, reflections, photographs, audio, or video in real time during fieldwork. By capturing data at the moment and place of occurrence, the method reduces recall bias and enables richer, contextually anchored documentation compared with traditional pen-and-paper notes written retrospectively.A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Mobile Field Notes · Research Diary. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare