ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

混合方法元推断×转型混合方法设计×
领域研究设计研究设计
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1998–20032003–2009
提出者Abbas Tashakkori & Charles TeddlieDonna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
类型Mixed methods integration procedureMixed methods research design
开创性文献Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
别名meta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inferencetransformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
相关66
摘要Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone.Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Mixed Methods Meta-Inference · Transformative Mixed Methods Design. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare