方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 混合方法矩阵× | 并行嵌入式混合方法设计× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究设计 | 研究设计 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2003–2010 | 2003–2007 |
| 提出者≠ | Tashakkori & Teddlie; Onwuegbuzie & Teddlie | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 类型≠ | Research design classification and planning tool | Mixed methods research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Sage. link ↗ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| 别名 | MMR matrix, mixed-methods design matrix, research design classification matrix, mixed methods typology matrix | embedded mixed methods, nested mixed methods design, concurrent nested design, CEMM |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | The mixed methods matrix is a systematic framework for classifying, planning, and comparing mixed methods research designs along key dimensions such as timing (concurrent vs. sequential), priority (quantitative- vs. qualitative-dominant), and point of integration. It provides researchers with a structured map to make design decisions explicit, communicate choices transparently, and locate a study within the broader mixed methods typology. | The concurrent embedded mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data at the same time, but assigns unequal priority to the two strands: one (usually quantitative) serves as the primary study, while the other (usually qualitative) is nested inside it to answer a supplementary question. The embedded strand does not stand alone; it provides a different perspective on the same phenomenon within a single unified study. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|