ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

最小-最大归一化×多属性边界近似区域比较×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19812015
提出者Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K.Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G.
类型Normalization (linear, range-scaling)Border approximation area (distance from BAA)
开创性文献Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 186, Springer-Verlag DOI ↗Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要MIN-MAX-NORMALIZATION (Min-Max Normalization — linear rescaling of each criterion column to [0, 1]) is a normalization multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. in 1981. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: MIN-MAX-NORMALIZATION · MABAC. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare