ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Migrant Integration Index×Migrant Integration Policy Index×
领域Migration StudiesMigration Studies
方法族Latent structureProcess / pipeline
起源年份20182020
提出者Niklas Harder, Lucila Figueroa, Rachel M. Gillum, Dominik Hangartner, David D. Laitin & Jens HainmuellerThomas Huddleston, Giacomo Solano (Migration Policy Group / CIDOB)
类型Latent multidimensional survey scale of individual integrationExpert-coded composite policy benchmarking index
开创性文献Harder, N., Figueroa, L., Gillum, R. M., Hangartner, D., Laitin, D. D., & Hainmueller, J. (2018). Multidimensional Measure of Immigrant Integration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11483-11488. DOI ↗Solano, G., & Huddleston, T. (2020). Migrant Integration Policy Index 2020. Barcelona/Brussels: CIDOB and Migration Policy Group. ISBN: 9788492511839
别名IPL Integration Index, IPL-12 Integration Measure, Individual Immigrant Integration Scale, Multidimensional Integration Survey IndexMIPEX, MIPEX Construction, Integration Policy Benchmarking Index, National Integration Policy Scorecard
相关33
摘要The migrant integration index developed by Harder, Hainmueller, Laitin and colleagues in 2018 is a short, validated survey instrument that measures how integrated an individual immigrant is across six distinct dimensions: psychological, economic, political, social, linguistic, and navigational. Earlier integration research suffered from a proliferation of ad hoc, single-dimension proxies — employment alone, or language alone — that were not comparable across studies, groups, or countries. The IPL index, named for Stanford's Immigration Policy Lab, instead defines integration as inherently multidimensional and provides standardized batteries — a twelve-item short form (IPL-12) and a twenty-four-item long form (IPL-24) — that aggregate the six dimensions into a single, comparable score for each person. Critically, the instrument is designed and validated psychometrically, with the short form shown to track the long form and external outcomes closely, so researchers can capture the full breadth of integration in just a few minutes of survey time. The result is a portable, individual-level measurement tool that brings consistency to a field long fragmented by incommensurable indicators.The Migrant Integration Policy Index, known as MIPEX and maintained by the Migration Policy Group and CIDOB with its 2020 edition by Solano and Huddleston, measures not how integrated immigrants are but how well a country's policies support their integration. It scores national laws and regulations across eight policy domains — labour-market mobility, family reunification, education, health, political participation, permanent residence, access to nationality, and anti-discrimination — by having country experts code each policy against a benchmark of the highest equal-treatment standard. Each indicator is scored on a simple scale anchored to legal text, domain scores are averaged, and the eight domains combine into a single composite that ranks dozens of countries on a comparable 0-to-100 scale. The result is a transparent, benchmarked scorecard of integration policy that lets researchers, governments, and advocates compare national approaches and track them over multiple editions. MIPEX measures the policy environment as an input to integration, complementing individual-level outcome measures such as survey-based integration indices.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Migrant Integration Index · Migrant Integration Policy Index. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare