ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

微平均F1分数×加权F1×
领域模型评估模型评估
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份2000s2000s
提出者Multi-class evaluation communityMulti-class evaluation community
类型Evaluation metricEvaluation metric
开创性文献Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗
别名Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1Support-weighted F1
相关43
摘要Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance.Weighted F1 computes the F1-score for each class and then takes a weighted average, where weights are proportional to the number of samples in each class (support). It provides a middle ground between macro and micro-averaging.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Micro-averaged F1 · Weighted F1. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare