ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Metropolis-Hastings 用于模型比较×用于模型比较的MCMC×
领域贝叶斯贝叶斯
方法族Bayesian methodsBayesian methods
起源年份1970 (extended 1995)1995
提出者W. K. Hastings (1970); extended for model comparison by P. J. Green (1995)Peter J. Green (reversible-jump MCMC); Meng & Wong (bridge sampling)
类型MCMC-based model comparisonBayesian computational method
开创性文献Hastings, W. K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika, 57(1), 97-109. DOI ↗Green, P. J. (1995). Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika, 82(4), 711–732. DOI ↗
别名MH model comparison, Metropolis-Hastings Bayes factor estimation, reversible-jump Metropolis-Hastings, MH model selectionreversible-jump MCMC, RJMCMC, marginal likelihood estimation via MCMC, Bayesian model selection via MCMC
相关45
摘要Metropolis-Hastings for model comparison uses the Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm to explore both parameter and model space simultaneously, producing posterior probabilities for competing models and enabling Bayes factor estimation without requiring closed-form marginal likelihoods. The canonical extension — reversible-jump MCMC by Green (1995) — handles models of different dimensionalities within a single sampler.MCMC for model comparison uses Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms to estimate the marginal likelihoods and Bayes factors needed to formally compare competing statistical models. Techniques such as reversible-jump MCMC and bridge sampling allow exploration across model spaces of different dimensionality, enabling fully Bayesian model selection and averaging.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Metropolis-Hastings for model comparison · MCMC for Model Comparison. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare