ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于元回归的快速综述×系统性文献综述×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s (convergence of rapid review and meta-regression)1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
提出者Meta-regression: Simon Thompson & Stephen Sharp (1999); Rapid review methodology: Cochrane, WHO, and health technology assessment bodies (2000s onward)Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
类型Quantitative evidence synthesis variantEvidence synthesis methodology
开创性文献Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18(20), 2693–2708. DOI ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
别名rapid review with meta-regression, accelerated meta-regression review, rapid synthesis with meta-regression, RRMRSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
相关55
摘要A meta-regression-based rapid review is an accelerated evidence synthesis that combines the time-efficient protocols of a rapid review with meta-regression analysis to identify which study-level or population-level characteristics explain variability in effect sizes across included studies. By streamlining search and screening steps without sacrificing the explanatory power of regression modeling, this approach delivers actionable heterogeneity insights under decision-making time constraints.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: meta-regression-based rapid review · Systematic Literature Review. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare