ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于元回归的元分析×系统性文献综述×
领域科学计量学科学计量学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1993–19991993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
提出者Stephen G. Thompson & Simon J. Sharp (systematic framework); earlier work by Berlin, Longnecker & Greenland (1993)Archie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
类型Quantitative evidence synthesis with covariate modelingEvidence synthesis methodology
开创性文献Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. (1999). Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18(20), 2693–2708. DOI ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
别名meta-regression, meta-analytic regression, weighted regression meta-analysis, MR-MASLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
相关45
摘要Meta-regression-based meta-analysis extends standard meta-analysis by fitting a weighted regression model in which study-level characteristics (moderators) predict observed effect sizes. Rather than simply pooling effects, this approach asks why effects vary across studies — linking heterogeneity in outcomes to differences in population, intervention, design, or measurement features. It is the primary tool for explaining between-study variance in quantitative evidence synthesis.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: meta-regression-based meta-analysis · Systematic Literature Review. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare